Very few people deny
that the Earth is going towards an ecologic disaster. History has
witnessed the disappearance of species, continents and islands. But
those disasters were not caused by man. It’s only a matter of looking
at the skies over big cities, at our beaches, seas and rivers. The
diseases related to the deterioration of the natural environment have
increased in the form of asthmas, allergies, cancer, heart disease,
problems with the skin and the glandular system and, the worst of all,
the traumas to the reproductive capacities of human beings. To ignore
scientific studies is a different and more dangerous form of suicide
than tobacco, drugs, or weapon proliferation and speeding on highways.
Paul Kennedy, professor at Yale and
author of an important reflection in the article Two studies, one conclusion, says these haven’t been good times
for conservatives in the United States, who claim that the free market
economy solves all the problems and go against to schemes of
international government while they support the right of all citizens to
drive a vehicle that pollutes irresponsibly and consider Kyoto Protocol
to be socialist filth.
He cites Tim Barnett of the Scripps Oceanography Institution in San
Diego, who gave new evidence of ecosystems that shatter under the
tension of climate change. Some of the information about plants that
change color, sea birds that die, the melting of the Andean glaciers are
terrifying. The evidence of his team’s report is so categorical that
any attack motivated by Washington against the thesis that human
activity is causing global warming would be “untenable”.
He asks himself if the Bush administration and its members linked to the
oil industry, as well as its experts, will acknowledge that they were
mistaken and that urgent measures are essential. Especially in the
United States, where 4.5 percent of the world population produces 25
percent of all the gases that cause the Greenhouse Effect on the
atmosphere. That’s why Paul Kennedy presents another study based on
the annual survey about tendencies of the world population realized by
the UN Population Fund, another body formed by demographers, economists
and highly qualified scientists. He claims that the world population is
not slowing its pace as much as conservatives had predicted. World
population will go from 6.4 billion today to 9.1 billion in 2050, this
change being the most dramatic in the poorest countries.
He uses the examples of India and China. The former grows so rapidly
that its population will surpass that of China in the next generation.
They both represent almost one third of the whole of Humanity. Their
carbon and oil needs are well known, caused not only by their gigantic
populations that go from wood and manure to fossil fuels as sources of
heat, light and cooking, but also by their rapid industrial growth.
In one year, oil imports in China grew by a third, exceeding those of
Japan. India’s oil imports grew by 11 percent and continue alarmingly
doing so. All this contributes to the unbearable rise of these products
essential for the maintenance of the Western Countries’ living
standards. Oil prices have increased to levels that were never thought
of. All this when the OPEC announced the increase in the production to
500.000 more barrels everyday to avoid that ruinous rise that
speculators provoke.
Let’s remember that China and India are exempt of adhering themselves
to the limitations in the emissions of Kyoto’s Protocol because, in spite of
their enormous spending in fuels, they still consume less than a sixth
of the United States index per person.
“As more evidence comes up about the harm we are doing to our planet
because of the frantic use of energy – Kennedy wonders – while China
and India advance to become the greatest producers of gas that produce
the Greenhouse Effect in the world, which economic, scientific and moral
power can place Washington on top of the negotiation table to impede
that we inherit a rotten planet to our grandsons? Very little. When
Great Britain, Germany, the United States and Japan were becoming
industrialized at a great speed 100 years ago, they endured an
international battle to gain power over the world’s energy resources,
no matter where.”
The same happens nowadays. The rivalry between
the United States, China and India, along with Japan and Europe for the
oil and gas resources is almost desperate. The most worrisome thing is
that US foreign policy will face the vital interests of the two giants,
India and China, who will not accept the game rules imposed by Western
countries.